Solution for A Divided America

 Essays  Comments Off on Solution for A Divided America
Feb 202017
 

Solution for a Divided America

Something is seriously wrong in America today, and many news casters on TV and radio are coming to the same conclusion; which is that we are as divided as we were just before the Civil War.

Abraham Lincoln said:

“A house divided against itself cannot stand”

But none of our news casters seem to realize that it is themselves who are to blame for this. If you listen to MSNBC about one story, then go to FOX news, you will hear the same story; except that it is the exact opposite.

How can this be? Consider this example; Barack Obama once said: “if an enemy convoy is headed to America to attack, he won’t use nuclear weapons”. The Left Wing said this was courageous because it will prove our moral superiority. The Right Wing said this is stupid because it would needlessly cost American lives, so just nuke’em and get it over with. Who is right? Who is wrong? This depends on which news source you watch all the time.

All the news sources use people who are the best con-artists ever. They are selected because they have great personality and devastating charisma. Just look at Chris Matthews, Bill O’ Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Rachel Maddow and all the rest of them.

Both sides do an extremely good job of making the other side look like liars, incompetents, and just downright dangerous people, hell bent on destroying the nation. Plus they all do it with selective written proof and video of actual events. It’s really amazing. But what they are really doing is destroying the other stations for ratings, the higher their own ratings, the higher their paychecks.

For example: Rachel Maddow of MSNBC once put on a game show skit with contestants who tackled the issue of who is the biggest spending president. The conclusion they came to was that President George Bush (the younger) was the biggest spending President in American history. Then FOX said that when Barack Obama started his first term, the national debt was 10 trillion dollars and when Obama left the White House, the national debt was 20 trillion dollars. Making Obama the President, who spent more than all former presidents combined.

But MSNBC is not the only bad boy in town. Bill O’Reilly of FOX News fame once said that FOX News does not insult the other news networks, while the other networks insult FOX News all the time by calling them racist, sexist, homophobic etc. etc. Then John Stewart showed a video of Bill O’Reilly calling Left wing people pinheads and loons. But, believe it or not; the big Irish man O’Reilly did apologize, he had no choice.

Denzel Washington said: “If you don’t read the newspaper you’re uninformed, if you do read it,  you’re misinformed.”

I can give other examples here, but then so can anybody else; suffice it to say that the mass media is an out of control circus. That would be a joke, except that the news media is endangering the whole nation with division and (hopefully not), Civil War. The solution for this is as simple as it can get; we have to impose “Parliamentary Rules of Debate” on the news media.

If you look at governments around the world (except dictatorships) they have a congress with opposing sides debating issues with strict rules of debate that include time limits, the right to present an opposition voice and no interruptions. Our news media is nothing like this. Add to this is a habit most people have of watching the same news channel day after day with the same propaganda and after a while they get brain washed into thinking that the news they watch is the only right side and the other side is nuts.

As another example, most court rooms have the same structure in that there is a defense attorney and a prosecuting attorney; if there were only a defense attorney then nobody would go to jail, if there were only a prosecuting attorney then everybody goes to jail because the jury is only getting one side of the story. Having a defense and a prosecutor examines all sides of the case and it’s more likely to get the right decision. This is what must happen in our news media– all sides of an issue must be examined to get to the best decision possible; clearly this is not happening now.

Right now we can’t even have civil discussions among citizens because we have different facts. It’s all “Fake News” or “Alternative Facts” in a “Post Truth” world. It’s all lies and B.S.

Look at the case of Ivanka Trump. Her clothing line has been dropped from many stores. MSNBC said this is because of declining sales. But FOX says the opposite because the sales are up 21% and total profits were 100 million in 2016. So this is just an attack on Ivanka  because of her dad’s Presidency. This is typical of news operations.

By “Parliamentary Rules of Debate” I mean  all newspapers must have two columns, one for the home newspaper, the other column right next to it must belong to an opposition newspaper, so that an opposition can be heard. The same for all web pages, opposing opinions must be side by side. TV news must have an opposition seat belonging to the opposition with full rights of parliamentary debate, even shutting off the mike for interruptors. Penalties and fines must be used for violations.

This raises many questions, like how can you put Bill O’Reilly right next to Rachel Maddow, no building can take the pressure without blowing up, but something has to be worked out to unite our nation.

Rodney King said: “Why can’t we all just get along”

Jose Lugo, editor DDTV.ORG

Election Protests

 Essays  Comments Off on Election Protests
Nov 182016
 

Now that the circus that some people have called a presidential election is over, it seems that I was right in predicting that it didn’t matter who won the election, there will be trouble either way.

Enter the protesters who don’t like the fact that Donald Trump will be president of the United States. But what some people don’t realize is that if Hillary Clinton won the election things would be even worse than they are now. I base this on some meetings I went to with some Right Wing groups who met for one reason, but were instead talking about “If Hillary wins, what militia will you be joining” (the Florida Militia; Charlie Company sounded good to me). In other words, we may now be facing even more violence on the streets than we are now, instead of some immature lefties breaking up junk on the streets.

Or look at it this way, there are about 20,000 to maybe 30,000 protesters on the streets, while there were about 60 million people who legally voted for Donald Trump; if somehow the Trump victory is overturned, I don’t think the 60 million who voted for Trump will remain quiet about this. The possibility of more street violance is real, don’t kid yourself.

Some people might think that the election is the main cause of the current riots, but in fact the election is a minor cause; the main cause of the riots is the nature of liberals. You see, it is the fact that you just can not talk to a liberal. If you try to talk to them, what you say maybe a micro aggression, or it’s politically incorrect, or you just can not make contact with them because they’re hiding in a safe room, and only come out for their daily brain-washing in the MSNBC echo chamber. In other words, they don’t have democratic values, it’s their way or the highway. So, if something doesn’t go their way, it’s riot time. My four year old is the same way, so I can understand them.

As for the Right Wing point of view in this ( which the Left refuse to understand because of the above mentioned); the Right Wing people see Hillary Clinton as a committed criminal who has often crossed the line in her 30 years in government. Her latest crime was to delete 33,000 emails that were subpoenaed by Congress, this is clearly a felony; and people who committed this same crime are now sitting in jail. But Hillary avoided jail because she has friends in the Justice Department, and the White House (Obama) who are covering for her.

Can you imagine a government full of criminals covering for each other while engaging in criminal activities and getting away with it. This makes the Democratic Party a criminal enterprise, AKA Mafia, and so completely un-acceptable to  Republicans and Conservatives.

Liberals and Democrats are going to have to get out of their safe room, and learn how to talk to and LISTEN to people with different points of view; if they don’t, then they will never achieve their stated goal of achieving a caring, inclusive, fair society. Liberal arrogance  is creating a racist, divided, violent society with limited economic opportunities.

Having an inclusive society does not mean insulting people by calling them racist, sexist, homophobic or deplorable; it means talking to them to solve problems of society. Admit where  you are wrong, move forward where you find agreement.

Liberals, wise-up.

Now it’s only a question as to how far the protests will go. Will the protesters wake-up and realize their cause is a lost cause, or will they keep pushing until they all wind up in jail. Or will the riots get out of control, causing a reaction from the Right Wing. Time will tell. But I’m putting my bets on the protesters giving-up, just like the “Occupy Wall Street” protests just a few years ago. They have no justifiable cause.

The Donald is President, come out of the MSNBC echo chamber, get some fresh air and deal with it.

Jose Lugo, editor ddtv.org

 

When All Was Set Right

 Essays  Comments Off on When All Was Set Right
Nov 012016
 

It’s the year 2085 and a group of scientists, journalists, and politicians were sitting around and trying to figure out when all things were finally set right in the world, so that the history books can be correct. They finally agreed that it happened around the year 2016. This was when a woman by the name of Hillary Clinton won the president’s office in America.

She took bold and courageous actions as soon as she took office. The first thing she did was to announce to the world that she will no longer be called Hillary Clinton, instead she will be called “Dear Leader”. And she vowed to set all things right.

The first thing she did was to give Texas, New Mexico and Arizona to Mexico, then Mexico was happy. Then she gave Hawaii and California to China, then China was happy. Then she gave Alaska to Russia, then Russia was happy.

Our Dear Leader who is all knowing, had known for a long time that Republicans and Conservatives were not happy, so she abolished the IRS to create a smaller government, just like they wanted. Then to simplify things even more and save some tax dollars, she ordered that all tax money is to be sent directly to the “Clinton Foundation”. All the Republicans, Conservatives  and “ultra right wing gun nuts” were so happy that they were never seen or heard from again. Chelsea Clinton who was in charge of the Clinton Foundation was also happy.

Many in the American “Silent Majority” were not happy, so Dear Leader ordered that they were to live a life of leasure and not be bothered with the small things in life like running the government, so Dear Leader made herself “Leader for Life” and got rid of Congress to save money and make things simpler. Then to make Republicans and Conservatives even happier she shut down the education system, and so saved a lot of money that was being wasted, and so now that money can be sent to the Clinton Foundation so that it can be wisely spent.

A minor problem developed when some Americans were running off to Mexico for reasons that were never determined. These illegal Americans were undermining the Mexican labor force with their cheap labor, and causing Mexico all sorts of problems with crime and non-payment of taxes. But our Dear Leader had a meeting with the Mexican government where a historic agreement was reached whereby Mexico was allowed to gather up all the illegal Americans on their sacred soil and grind them up to be used as fertilizer to grow avocados. Those avocados were the finest avocados in the world.

Then it came to our Dear Leaders attention that the Chinese people were not happy. They had too much paperwork to do in collecting body parts from Americans. So, one day after our Dear Leader had taken her nap, she signed an executive order called the “Sub-Species Act” whereby all American’s were declared a sub-species and so the great Chinese people were allowed to collect all body parts that Americans had two of. So they were allowed to collect one eye, one lung, one kidney, one arm, one leg, one ovary and one testicle from each American without the long paperwork they had to do before. One day there was an over abundance of body parts and nobody knew what to do with it. But not our Dear Leader, she knew what to do right away, she ordered that all extra American body parts are to be ground up and used as cattle feed.

But not all was happy in happy land; there was a small group in the South East that was composed of racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic people that were irrational barbarians that had seized all the Army Bases, Air Force Bases and harbors in the South East. They were a violent people and they did all sorts of politically incorrect things. Our  Dear Leader would often say she will take care of this right after her nap, but then she would forget about it until the next time it was mentioned.

Then one day, our Dear Leader, being the great intellectual she is, she managed to unite the whole world together and so make herself the “Whole World Dear Leader”. The people of the world were so happy that they asked her what would really make her happy, and she said she wanted her own country, and so they gave her France. Then to make sure France was hers and hers only, all the men of France were removed and sent to China where they were well taken care of. Then all the women of France were given to Bill Clinton, then Bill Clinton was happy.

And so all was set right, and all the world was happy.

Jose Lugo, editor ddtv.org

lugo@ddtv.org

 

 

Debate Wrap-Up

 Essays  Comments Off on Debate Wrap-Up
Oct 262016
 

America is under attack by Muslim terrorists, we are 20 trillion in debt, Detroit and Chicago are killing fields, one third of our manufacturing sector has been sent to other countries, the murder rate is up, the poverty rate is up, wages have been stagnant for the last 30 years, Social Security is going bankrupt, our roads and bridges are crumbling:

So, what was the number one issue in the presidential debates:

Donald Trumps potty mouth, what else?

True, some of the things the Donald has said about women are wrong, but look at it this way; he has started a discussion that is long over due in our country, that is that women are mistreated. Women don’t get the same pay men get for the same work, they are often on the abused side of domestic violence. Locker room trash talking women starts a process that expands way beyond the locker room. Some men think this is the way women should be treated because of the locker room trash talking about them. But now this is changing, society has collectively stated loud and clear that trash talking women is wrong, because talking behind someones back totally violates the sense of fairness our nation was founded on, or that trash talking is done by somebody who just wants to look bad, as “bad is good” in our sick culture. Hopefully, the way women are treated may soon change and they will be treated with the respect, caring and the love they certainly deserve.

As for the rest of the debate; Hillary is a real paradox since the Wikileaks disclosures proved that Hillary has both public positions and private positions; it’s difficult to know what her real position on any issue is. This showed up clearly when Trump asked her about her open borders ideas, to which she answered by talking about energy policy. It was the biggest flip I ever saw in a debate.

But the Donald has been consistent in his outrageous statements. One was when he threatened to have Hillary investigated by his attorney general if elected. He even said that if he was President, she would be in jail. This has never been done during a debate. But some of the listeners sure agreed with him on this.

Trump is about as unconventional as you can get, while Hillary is as corrupt establishment as you can get. And in an election year when most voters are angry at the corrupt establishment, it’s a mystery as to why Hillary is ahead in the polls. Can Trump’s potty mouth be that bad that voters prefer Hillary with her long history of scandals and corruption over Trump who has a long history of business, some good, some bad, but overall successful. He knows how business works, he knows the tax code; he knows the government is corrupt and working for itself, not the people who elected them.

This whole election is a record breaker as far as unexpected crazy stuff is concerned, but one thing is too frighteningly clear; emotions and anger has reached fever pitch, so much so that, regardless of who wins the election, the voters on the other side may not accept the winner. The Republicans will not accept Hillary as President, and the Democrats will not accept Trump as President. What happens next will not be funny, because we may be headed for real trouble.

Lets not forget that after the election of Abraham Lincoln, that the nation was so angry and divided that the South seceded from the union and the Civil War began. Is the current situation that bad? I hope not.

Jose Lugo, editor for ddtv.org
Lugo@ddtv.org

As Far As Hillary’s Emails Go

 Essays  Comments Off on As Far As Hillary’s Emails Go
Oct 182016
 

Apparently, the FBI forgot to visit the Cornell Law Library. Word for word from the Cornell Law Library Former United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey tells MSNBC that not only is Hillary Clinton’s private email server illegal, it “disqualifies” her from holding any federal office. Very specifically points to one federal law, Title 18. Section 2071.

For those of us who do not have United States Code committed to memory, here’s what it says:

“(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.”

Yes, it explicitly states “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.

Shouldn’t voters know that? The media won’t tell them. So it’s up to us.
Like · Reply · 43 · Oct 10, 2016 7:38pm

VP Debate

 Essays  Comments Off on VP Debate
Oct 082016
 

The Vice Presidential debate was predictable in that Tim Kaine promoted government control and Mike Pence promoted individual enterprise.

Right from the start Tim Kaine (D) started interrupting Mike Pence (R) and he just kept at it until Pence realized that he is not going to finish any thought he has, so he also started interrupting. It all started to look like a Fox News Bill O’Reilly show in that everybody was talking at the same time, only causing confusion.

The moderator did a lousy job because she was not able to get them to talk individually. This is because she got the job due to political correctness, not because she knew how to moderate a debate; because she didn’t.

From the beginning it became clear that Kaine is the sort of guy who has to have control. Kaine thinks of himself as the authority guy that must be in charge, so he has to correct anybody with a different point of view, they are wrong if he says so.

Tim Kaine made a big twist of facts when he claimed Donald Trump did not want to pay taxes to support our troops. But the fact of the matter is that Trump had a huge financial loss of 916 million dollars that threatened his business, and so he had to carry the loss into future years to save his company. This is standard business practice that a lot of business people use and it’s legal under the tax code. But Tim Kaine, the authority guy, says Trump didn’t want to support our troops. The fact of the matter is that Trump paid millions of dollars in taxes throughout his business career.

On the other hand, Mike Pence came across as the sort of guy that wants to sit down and talk things over to look for solutions. The type of person that we could use more of in Washington DC and throughout the country.

The rest of the debate was the candidates repeating the party line. Dull.

Jose Lugo, editor DDTV.ORG

lugo@ddtv.org

Did the Debate Change Anything?

 Essays  Comments Off on Did the Debate Change Anything?
Oct 032016
 

The most hyped debate in recent times is over, but what happened?

It started with Hillary charging ahead like a steam roller, because she had the assurance that the news media will cover or make excuses for any mistakes she may make, while the Donald was just buzzing around like a little fly making little sound bites here and there.

The worst mistake Trump made was when Hillary started talking about creating jobs and Trump criticized this, but he was silent about how when Bill Clinton was president (and was supported by Hillary) and signed into law the “North American Free Trade Agreement” and also signed into law our membership in the “World Trade Organization”, and then just to make sure the damage was Complete, also gave China special trade status. The result of these laws was to make American manufactures compete with countries that had labor costs about one or two dollars and hour while
Americans had an average labor cost of about $10 an hour. The result of this was massive damage to our manufacturing sector with about 1/3 of our manufacturing capacity going to other countries. This damage was so severe that even today, America still has not recovered, Trump also did not mention that Hillary and her husband lied to Americans by saying NAFTA would create jobs which has clearly not happened, NAFTA only created massive damage and job loss in America.

Another mistake Trump made was when Hillary said Trump should publish his tax returns; instead of saying, “he will publish his tax returns when Hillary publishes an audit of the Clinton Foundation” he only promised to publish his tax returns later. The Clinton Foundation has been Accused of being a money laundering operation by some people because only about 6% of its revenues go to poverty programs while the rest just disappears like a typical scam.

Hillary also criticized Trumps tax cut plan as “trickle Down Economics” and so is proven to be unworkable, But Trump made a good counter in saying that America has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world and so is driving manufacturing away from America. If America dropped it’s current 35% corporate tax down to 15% it would attract manufacturing back to America. The Democratic parties policies of high taxes and over regulation has made America a place where you can’t do business. Trump proposed to change this with lower taxes and less regulation. Ronald Reagan already proved this works.

Hillary is a scandal rich candidate, but yet Trump did not take advantage of this opportunity. Trump said nothing about the Clinton Foundation pay to play scandal. Nothing about Hillary destroying 33,000 subpoenaed top secret emails, and the FBI director, James Comey (Obamas lap dog), letting her go on this matter. Nothing about her saying,”at this point what difference does it make”, when four brave Americans were murdered in Benghazi. Nothing about her lie about a video causing the Banghazi attack. Nothing about her helping Russia buy a uranium mine in
Canada in exchange for a donation to the Clinton Foundation. Nothing about her covering up for her rapist husband. Nothing about, after serving in the White House, walking out with the silverware, paintings and furniture. Nothing about her lie about being under sniper fire in Ukraine. Maybe Trump did this because of the hammering the liberal press gave him. When the news media did his to Mitt Romney, he went to the debate with Obama so politically frozen correct that he was barely able to talk. This didn’t affect Trump that much, but his performance was not as expected. Maybe at the next debate, the real Trump will be back. I hope.

Hillary makes great speeches, but she also has a reputation of shady dealing that often crosses the line into illegal behavior. But she has Obama covering for her and keeping the FBI away from her. Donald Trump often says the wrong thing at the wrong time and sure knows how to raise peoples tempers. But Donald Trump is a business man, he knows business; this expertise is what America needs right now, not Hillary’s socialist stupidity. The real business world is sometimes not nice, but it’s the real world and Trump learned how to work it in the “dog eat dog” business world of New York City.

“If he can make it there, he can make it anywhere”.

But, just to get real here, Donald Trump has a very slim chance of becoming president, mainly because he just threw away the women vote for no good reason, and women are the majority voters. The only reason he is doing so good in the polls is because Hillary is that bad, I mean criminally bad.

The bottom line here is 70% of Americans believe America is on the wrong track. Hillary will continue Obama”s road to socialism, and anybody with half a brain knows that socialism is a historically proven failure. Donald Trump knows this and is a master at how free enterprise works and can make it work again in America, if only he can get back the women’s vote.

Jose Lugo, editor DDTV.ORG
lugo@ddtv.org

 

 

 

Race Riots

 Essays  Comments Off on Race Riots
Sep 252016
 

This is not news anymore.

Another white cop kills a black man and riots erupt with the usual smashed windows, burning buildings and torching cars. Also, not new is the fact that our government, you know the one that keeps telling us that that know it all and can fix anything; looks like it hasn’t got a clue about what to do about it.

You would think that the politicians might say something like “that cop that did the shooting has a right to a fair trial like all other citizens, and this is necessary if we are not to be ruled by Jim Crow laws with lynchings and terror as the usual way to do things”. No, our politicians are doing nothing useful.

In fact the Mayor of Baltimore Maryland, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake even said “Those who wish to do destruction will be given space to do so”. She should have been thrown out of office for saying this, but no, she is still there doing nothing useful at all.

Sure some black people believe the fiction that police are hunting them down and killing them, but why don’t they realize that more white people are killed by cops than black people? Why haven’t the politicians impressed them with this fact? Is it that the politicians want the riots and property destruction so that they can have a grievance population that they can cater to for votes?

Why is it that 3,600 black people are killed by other black people in Chicago and this is hardly mentioned by the main stream press, but yet a couple dozen black people are killed by cops and riots break out. I would think that the lives of 3,600 people matter more than a couple of dozen killed by cops. Where are the priorities of these people, or is it that the politics matter more. If so, then this whole situation is really sick.

Why isn’t the news media saying that some people like to riot and smash up buildings and cars. Why aren’t these people being arrested and charged with the crimes they commit.

The answer to all this is that the ruling class wants the riots, the killing, the property destruction. Barack Obama himself even had the Black Lives Matter group invited to the White House, maybe he likes to hear them advocate for the killing of our police.

Somebody, somewhere wants to destabilize America to bring on martial law or a dictatorship.

Wise-up America.

Jose Lugo, editor of DDTV.Org

 

Here’s a very scary thought (from a friend)

 Essays  Comments Off on Here’s a very scary thought (from a friend)
Aug 192016
 

I had to take my vehicle to the mechanic the other day for service. The Service Manager, Pete, gave me a ride home and on the way he told me his theory about the upcoming election and the next four years of U.S. government. At first I thought it a bit far fetched. But as I listened to him it began to make sense, scary sense…
“I believe that Hillary Clinton will win the election in November,” Pete began. “Then, sometime between November and January, Hillary will be indicted. The IRS is now investigating the Clinton Foundation and the whole e-mail thing isn’t over yet. Once under indictment she won’t be able to assume the Office of the President in January. Tim Kaine, who will not actually be the Vice President because neither he nor Hillary have been inaugurated, cannot assume the Presidency. The Speaker of the House can’t move up to it because there is already a sitting President and Vice President. So President Obama, in an Executive Order citing ’emergency situation,’ gives himself another four years in office is the only way possible.”
Pete believes Obama has been planning this for a while now, knowing he has enough on Hillary to indict her. Had the Attorney General indicted her based on evidence from the FBI, the plan wouldn’t have worked because the DNC would have quickly come up with another candidate.
If you think about it, it’s not that outrageous. Many people on the left, including the President, want Obama to stay another four years. The law prohibits him from being re-elected so the only 2 ways he can do it is either by declaring martial law and suspending the election (which would be a very negative thing for the country) or to declare himself still President because the elected candidate cannot assume her duties.
The latter makes more sense and is actually more feasible. And since it’s never been done before, it would set a precedent that would be difficult to challenge.
Of course, if Trump wins the election none of this is going to happen. But what if Pete is correct? Four more years of Obama and a mostly useless Republican House and Senate would give Obama the time he needs to continue destroying the country to fit his stated goals.

I got this in a email, not sure who the writer is.
Jose Lugo, editor ddtv.org

 

 

Serious Questions About Hillary emails

 Essays  Comments Off on Serious Questions About Hillary emails
Jul 142016
 

Written by Mike Greene.
Some of you know I’m a former NYPD Detective and former Orange County Sheriff candidate. I conducted my own investigation. The results of my investigation will astound you and show a clear path to corruption here.

1. Here’s my step by step breakdown of this seemingly corrupt decision:

Lynch was appointed as U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, NY from 1999 to 2001. Who appointed her? Then President Bill Clinton.

2. Lynch resigned in 2001 to join the law firm Hogan & Hartson. This is the same law firm that represented the company MXLogic. MXLogic was the company Hillary first used to set up her private email server and account. Executives from this law firm have also donated to the Clintons.

3. From 2003 to 2005 Lynch served as a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of NY. The Federal Reserve Bank is actually a privately owned corporation, compromised of numerous banks. Several of these banks and or their executives have donated to the Clintons political campaigns and to the Clinton Foundation.

4. In 2010, President Obama re-appointed Lynch as U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn. In 2015, Obama then appointed her as head U.S. Attorney for the nation.

5. A few days ago, as we all know, Lynch met with Bill Clinton, privately, on her private government jet. This meeting was a few days before the FBI interviewed Hillary and a few days before todays announcement.

6. After this meeting, Lynch said something that no U.S. Attorney has ever said. She first apologized and said she should not have met him (obviously an apology based on her being caught, not apologizing for the actual action). She then states something U.S. Attorneys do not state. She stated her office will be guided by whatever recommendation the FBI gives them. Why was this statement ridiculous? She is the head of the U.S. Justice Department. The FBI is a sub unit of DOJ. She is the top boss, not Comey and not the FBI. Her office decides to prosecute or not, NOT the FBI.

7. In 1996 Comey was appointed as a Senate Committee Investigator /Counsel to investigate the Clintons in Whitewater. His findings concluded no wrongdoing with the Clintons.

8. Comey and Lynch met back in the early 2000’s. Comey was appointed by Bush as the U.S. Attorney for Manhattan.

9. In 2002, Bush appointed Comey as Deputy U.S. Attorney and he was tasked with investigating Bill Clintons mass pardons as he left office. Comey concluded that Clinton had done nothing wrong.

10. Comey went into private practice and in 2005.

11. In 2014, Obama appointed Comey as FBI Director. Lynch is Comeys boss, as she is the head of the parent agency, DOJ. Lynch is the chief law enforcement officer of our nation. Comey holds the number two position in the sub agency, the FBI. **************

At the end of the day, how do we have Lynch, previously appointed by Bill Clinton, and formerly an employee of the law firm that is connected to Hillarys email scandal, in charge of the investigation into Hillarys email scandal, with the lead investigative agency led by a man who twice investigated the Clintons and both times found them not guilty of wrong doing, also appointed by the current U.S. President, who appointed Lynch, who is Comeys boss?????? And Comey and Lynch have known each other for decades as well. How was this investigation to have ever been legitimate???? – Mike Greene

by Taboola Sponsored Links
MICHAEL & ROSEMARY VALLONE <vallonem@bellsouth.net>

Subject: Fw: Fwd: article explains a lot
Priority: Normal Date: Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:20 AM Size: 26 KB
On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:59 AM, Doris Lindsay <dorisll@optonline.net> wrote:

Begin forwarded message:

Subject: Fwd: article explains a lot